1 Apr 2014

Divergent movie review



In the posters for Divergent, Shailene Woodley has been given the stylized bod of a comic-book sci-action vamp, and her features are as coolly chiseled as her physique. But in the movie version of Veronica Roth's 2011 novel, Woodley, I'm glad to say, is a lot more recognizably human, and that goes for her acting too. Her character, Tris, spends most of the film learning to leap and toss knives and risk death like a badass, and when she puts those skills to the test battling her society's corrupt leaders, there's no doubt that she's a superior, market-tested YA role model, like Katniss in The Hunger Games. But she is also, as Woodley plays her, an intensely vulnerable and relatable character.

Tris, a.k.a. Beatrice, has been raised as a member of Abnegnation, one of five factions in a walled dystopia that was formerly Chicago and still looks, strikingly, like a semiruined concrete-playground version of that city. The members of Abnegnation dress in plain tan frocks, like the Amish, and they're all about puritan self-sacrifice. The other four factions are Erudite (defined by their transcendent knowledge), Candor (who are compulsively honest), Amity (the naturally peaceful), and Dauntless (the fearless tattooed warrior jocks in black — in other words, the sect that anyone cool would want to be part of). Beatrice and her peers have the right to choose a ­faction for themselves (it's like picking a college — you can go to Yale even if your folks didn't). But when she takes the test to learn which faction she's best suited for, it turns out that she's in the rare forbidden ­category known as Divergent, which means she has the qualities of three factions at once: Abnegnation, ­Erudite, and Dauntless. It may sound silly to say she's an outlaw because she's self-sacrificial, brilliant, and strong all at the same time, but what's really forbidden is ­independent thought.

Woodley, through the delicate power of her acting, does something compelling: She shows you what a prickly, fearful, yet daring personality looks like when it's nestled deep within the kind of modest, bookish girl who shouldn't even like gym class. Tris chooses to become part of Dauntless not because she has any special athletic skill but because it's her nature to go for broke. The first half of Divergent is a lean, exciting basic-training thriller, with Tris willing herself to do things like jump aboard speeding trains and fight with her bare knuckles. Woodley, at every turn, lets us feel as if we're in her shoes, not so much Dauntless as thrillingly daunted.

The second half of the movie goes on a bit, with too many rote combat scenes. Yet the director, Neil Burger (the fanciful craftsman who made Limitless and The Illusionist), keeps you invested, staging a rise-of-the-savior-heroine plot so that it seems less ritualistic than it does in the Hunger Games films. It helps that the drill sergeant, named Four, is played by Theo James, who's like an unflaky James Franco with a surly hint of T-shirt-era Brando; he brings off the neat trick of playing a hardass who is also a heartthrob. And it's nice to watch Kate Winslet go full ice-blood fascist as the Erudite leader who makes a scarily smart case for a society rooted in the fine art of ­control. In many ways, she sounds similar to a movie executive, so I'm glad to see the launch of a dystopian franchise in which individuality, as embodied by Shailene Woodley, looks like it could mean something beyond hiply propping up the status quo.

Trailer:


Mr. Peabody & Sherman movie review



In “Mr. Peabody and Sherman,” Mr. Peabody (Ty Burrell) is a genius dog, a college graduate with a penchant for bad puns. Sherman (Max Charles) is a boy, adopted by Mr. Peabody and raised to appreciate knowledge. They wear matching glasses. Only one of them wears a bow tie (hint: it’s the dog). My parents grew up watching Mr. Peabody and Sherman, the subjects of a series of shorts called “Peabody’s Improbable History” from “Rocky and His Friends” and “The Bullwinkle Show.” My mom is such a fan of the original show that our dog is named Mr. Peabody. I'm sure if I had come second, I would have been named Sherman, just for consistency.

Mr. Peabody and Sherman have stayed much the same in terms of their personalities, but their originally perplexing personal relationship is fleshed out in more detail in the film. Mr. Peabody, a know-it-all who refused to conform to society’s standards of how a dog should act, was never adopted. Because of his past, he decides to adopt a boy and save him from that fate. The crux of the film (and the television show) is that Mr. Peabody designed a “wayback machine” that allows him to witness important moments in history. The plot is kicked into gear when Sherman uses the wayback machine to prove a point to his brainy nemesis from school, Penny (Ariel Winter), against Mr. Peabody’s orders. The three then travel through time on an adventure to fix the past and the future.

Mr. Peabody’s vanity and self-confidence are intended to amuse, and Burrell pulls off the role impeccably. Not only does the dog think he is superior to the members of his own species, but he is also certain he’s better than all humans as well. “How hard could raising a child be?” he asks the judge who grants him approval, as a dog, to adopt. His plentiful puns—a throwback to the 1960s program—are intended to be silly jokes to himself that no one will understand, but they become painfully obvious in the over-the-top way he delivers them, if not to Sherman then to the audience. He wants everyone to know just how intelligent he is, and he never fails to share his knowledge. The character walks the line between grating and endearing with near perfection.What do you think?

There’s nothing spectacular or revolutionary about the animation, but it’s not bad. The story feels forced into being “aww”-worthy and the places and times they travel to are uninspired. In reinventing a classic, the new “Mr. Peabody and Sherman” takes away some of what made the series so original. Instead of a “History of the World: Part I” or “Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure” for kids, the movie is just another average animated film that panders to parents’ nostalgia

Trailer:


Vampire Academy movie review



Classifying 'Vampire Academy' into any one particular genre would be doing injustice to the film. It consists of part paranormal romance, part high school drama, part action with teen adventure and part coming-of-age stories that have been woven together into a predictable generic tale of vampires in St. Vladimir's Academy.

The Academy, a very Hogwartisian style institute in rural Montana houses the Moroi, the Strigoi, the Dhampir and humans. The Moroi are mortal vampires of a noble race who practice magic. They depend on human blood for food and have a code, a society, ethics, and a higher education system of sorts.

The Strigoi are the opposite of the Moroi. They are the evil vampires we're all familiar with. The Dhampir are half vampire and half human, they protect their Moroi masters from the Strigoi menace.
The film begins in a very cliched manner; a group of animated and overtly excited teenagers speeding in car and a voice over narrating, 'Less than a year, when we ran away from the academy, wanting to live like ordinary people' suddenly there is a head-on collision, a horrific accident on the highway.
What follows is, Rosemarie Hathaway (Zoey Deutch) and Lissa Dragomir (Lucy Fry) being nabbed by fellow vampires and are dragged back to the secluded St. Vladimir's.

Lissa is the last of the Dragomir family, heir to the royal throne of the Moroi, and Rose's best friend and classmate at the academy. Her absence at the academy was not going to be tolerated, as she would be the successor of Queen Tatiana (Joely Richardson).
Rose is her Dhampir guardian whose sole role is to protect Lissa from any danger. This forms the crux of the narration.

The sub-plot includes, the two of them trying to decide which cute boy they like while thrashing rivals and dealing with ominous signs of conspiracy. The entire track is so reminiscent of films like aTwilight' and aHarry Potter'.
The narration though engaging, drags a little bit in the middle, with some of the individual scenes lingering for a little too long than required.
The interpersonal undercurrents between the two main protagonists are undoubtedly convincing, Zoey Deutch engages you as Rose. Here character is challenging and she exhibits her charisma to the hilt.

The script by Daniel Waters based on Richelle Meads novels is light, bubbly and pretty devoid of fangs. The dialogues filled with youth slang are verbose and difficult to follow especially while explaining the complicated mythology.

Overall, Director Mark Waters' 'Vampire Academy' has its moments even though it has very little to offer in terms of wittiness, craftiness, shrewdness or novelty that one would expect in a vampire film. But it is sure to satisfy only the fans of the original source material.

Trailer:


The Lego Movie review




Most people would be sceptical about this movie, especially since the last movie to be based on a game/toy franchise bombed at the box office (Yes, I'm talking about Battleship). But the film is far more than it appears to be. On the surface, it may appear to consist solely of the little blocks that we all played with as kids, bringing in a sense of nostalgia right from the bat. But the movie genuinely has all the things it needs to have to be a commercial and critical success - a great and entertaining story-line, a fantastic voice over cast, smart and witty dialogues, and some of the best animation to come around in a while.

The story-line revolves around Emmett (Chris Pratt), a painfully normal guy with a normal job, a normal routine and a normal life. One day he meets a pretty girl Wyldstyle (Elizabeth Banks) and gets wrapped in a rebellion against President Business (Will Ferrell) to save the world. Now, the concept might not be the freshest - average guy learning he has the power to save the world, but what The Lego Movie does is not try to overcome the stereotypes, it embraces them. Sure, there are family moments, hilarious jokes, a love story, the overcoming of trials and tribulations - but in the end, all of this unfolds in a different way.

The cast consisting of A-Listers and your favourites from the small screen deliver brilliant performances as the tiny block characters. The film is riddled with pop-culture references, subtle humour and of course a whole bunch of characters that you will recognise, including Superman, Green Lantern, Abraham Lincoln, Gandalf, Wonder Woman and of course Batman.

Overall the movie is a brilliant mix of all the elements that you'd expect from a good entertaining film.

Trailer:



Legend of Hercules movie review




The origin story of the the mythical Greek hero. Betrayed by his stepfather, the King, and exiled and sold into slavery because of a forbidden love, Hercules must use his formidable powers to fight his way back to his rightful kingdom.

Gladiators and Greek mythology is Hollywood's favourite staple diet. The Legend of Hercules is one of the many such films that tries to make a quick buck using CGI, lavish sets and beefed up actors set against the backdrop of the famous Greek hero.

So there are several hard to pronounce and remember names such as Iphicles, Alcmene, Hebe and others, but the basic premise of the plot is quite simple. It is the story of Hercules realising his legacy and raging a battle to claim

Those who love the genre and can devour anything to do with Greek mythology might enjoy the inter personal dynamics between the various characters. There are ample action and battle scenes to keep the testosterone pumping. 

Hercules doesn't have a single original moment. Be it the action, the art work, or the special effects, all of it has been done before. There is a serious 300 hang over with the style of shooting the combat scenes.

Also Kellan Lutz has the body but he's unable to emote and play the lead role with conviction. A lot of times you feel like you are watching a cheap B-grade version of other much intelligently written and smartly shot films of the same genre.Strictly an average fare, Hercules will only appeal to those who can't enough of the Greek demi gods.

Trailer:


The Nut Job movie review




THE NUT JOB is an animated comedy following the animal inhabitants of a city park. When loner squirrel Surly (Will Arnett) selfishly foils the other animals' plan to swipe some nuts from a nut cart, Raccoon (Liam Neeson), the park leader, banishes him to the city. Exiled from the park, Surly and his best pal, a rat named Buddy, endure a frightening day in the city when they land right in front of a nut shop. Unbeknownst to Surly and Buddy, the owner of the nut shop is a recently released gangster King (Stephen Lang), and his crew of goons are planning to rob the bank across the street by digging a tunnel between the buildings. Meanwhile, Surly and a team from the park, led by determined female squirrel Andie (Katherine Heigl), plan their own heist -- of the nuts in the shop.

Remember the old candy bar slogan, "Sometimes you feel like a nut? Sometimes you don't?" -- well let's just say you probably won't feel like this particular Nut, but if you take your kids, the very youngest will probably dig the silliness. That is because most kids of a particular single-digit age will like any thing that makes them laugh and has gross-out jokes about burping and flatulence. The Nut Job offers those sorts of lowbrow scatological amusements in addition to the whole "talking animal" novelty that never seems to wear off for kids. But as for an animated movie that will appeal to older kids and parents, this isn't it.

First off, it's never quite clear when the movie is set. The human characters talk and look bit like they're in a '30s or '40s black-and-white gangster film, but the cars -- particularly the occasional checkered cab -- are more identifiably from the '50s, and the music includes electronic dance music like the 2012 South Korean dance hit, Gangnam Style. In addition to the decade confusion, the pacing is often way off, with strange editing hiccups that lead to an uneven viewing experience. And let's not even get started on the build up of both human and animal heists (the title refers to both) that never really leads anywhere. Some kids may not care about any of these flaws, because, of course, there are still animal farts and punny nut jokes involved. But parents, be aware this is far from a sophisticated animated comedy.

Trailer: